Search for: "Dial v. T "
Results 1 - 20
of 667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2015, 6:56 am
After I found the pocket dial case, I did a search in Westlaw for "butt dial" cases . . . and found one, which was decided a few weeks ago: Dietenberger v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:46 am
The opinion notes a few more relevant facts before addressing the legal issues: [T]he Huffs knew pocket dials are relatively common in the age of smart phones. . . . [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 2:41 pm
AT&T Services, Inc., [1] the court ruled that a dialing system that “neither stores nor produces numbers using a random or sequential number generator,” but rather “exclusively dials numbers stored in a customer database,” “is not an ‘automatic telephone dialing system’ as defined by the Act. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
” In a footnote, the court explains that [t]he term `pocket-dial’ refers to the accidental placement of a phone call when a person’s cellphone `bump[s] against other objects in a purse, briefcase, or pocket. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
In a footnote, the court explains that[t]he term `pocket-dial’ refers to the accidental placement of a phone call when a person's cellphone `bump[s] against other objects in a purse, briefcase, or pocket. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 1:18 pm
” Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:48 am
AT&T Services, Inc. that a defendant’s dialing system did not constitute an “automatic telephone dialing system” (ATDS) under the meaning of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act where it was not capable of generating random and sequential numbers. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 11:53 am
U.S. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
Norah will be performing in School of Rock’s “Left of the Dial” show, featuring the pre-Nirvana alt sounds of The Replacements, R.E.M., Dinosaur Jr., Echo and the Bunnymen, and others. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
after concluding that the dialing system used by AT&T did not qualify as an autodialer. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
In California v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:59 am
Liveperson, Inc. v. 24/7 Customer, Inc., 2015 WL 170348, No. 14 Civ. 1559 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 6:45 am
Dist. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm
Indiana Law Blog: “Federal Judge William T. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 5:04 pm
Last year however, in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 8:49 am
AT&T Servs., Inc., 950 F.3d 458, 464, 469 (7th Cir. 2020); Glasser v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 8:49 am
AT&T Servs., Inc., 950 F.3d 458, 464, 469 (7th Cir. 2020); Glasser v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 11:03 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
ObamaJewel v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 5:58 pm
AT&T Servs., Inc., 950 F.3d 458, 464, 469 (7th Cir. 2020) (Coney Barrett, J.); Glasser v. [read post]
